Asking the fleet what it is doing…
monad-knowledge Wi-Fi sensing lab · FIIT STU
Campaign session

01KWZE3BVCERY4G514G3PDM5ZT

finished 2026-07-07 23:20:05.741004+00:00 → 2026-07-07 23:21:27.986542+00:00 · 0 runs · supervisor: react-agent

“Partial seal, 0 runs: feasibility probe re-confirmed all 3 blockers (no stratified-LOS placement key, PostGIS down, corpus <20 floors); campaign not re-dispatchable per brief. No hypothesis retired.”

Archive snapshot, as of 23 h ago — the run corpus is rebuilt once a day, so this page is not a live reading. The fleet panel is the live one; it refreshes every 30 s.

Success criteria

CriterionResolved
Primary (topology): LOS-vs-NLOS mean CSI occupancy-sensitivity difference, 95% CI excluding 0 with |Cohen's d| >= 0.2, on a corpus with >=10 LOS and >=10 NLOS links per floor by construction. no
Horse-race honesty: floor-level area correlation and link-level topology correlation each reported as CI + effective n (a CI comparison, never a bare point-estimate contest). no
Method: Welch t (Satterthwaite df) + exact cluster-level permutation p, with one BH-FDR pass over the full predictor list of both topology sessions, m stated. no

Synthesis

Feasibility probe — partial seal, 0 runs (block re-confirmed)

Session 01KWZE3BVCERY4G514G3PDM5ZT re-ran the pre-batch feasibility probe that sealed the prior session (01KWWJ0REMMQ995BQRRZG3K6QS, also 0 runs). All three blockers in the brief's 2026-07-07 Status section persist. Per the brief's explicit "this campaign must not be re-dispatched", no runs were launched and no batch budget was spent on a race the design surface cannot yet stage fairly.

Probe findings (2026-07-07T23:20Z):

  1. Design surface (primary blocker). sionna-csi-runner capabilities remain {synthetic-csi, differentiable-ray-tracing, crowd-occlusion, channel-simulator, ble-rssi-synthesis, csi-hardware-impairments} — no stratified-los placement key. The brief's core requirement, "≥10 LOS + ≥10 NLOS links per floor by construction", is still inexpressible. Without it the c-csi-topology-sniffer-count imbalance (28/40 rows wall_count=1, 4/40 LOS) would recur — and per the audit's modal lesson, more seeds never fix a biased design.
  2. Infra. gis_stats → PostGIS unavailable (127.0.0.1:5434, password-auth failure). Scene staging via gis export-floor is impossible.
  3. Corpus. Floorplan inventory shows resplan with no staged files and missing _crs.txt; ZInD absent. The ≥20 ResPlan+ZInD floor target is unmet, and PostGIS being down blocks import regardless.

Success criteria — all unresolved (0 quantitative claims made):

  • Primary (topology d≥0.2 CI): no LOS/NLOS-balanced corpus constructible → no Cohen's d estimable.
  • Horse-race honesty: no links.parquet corpus → no area-vs-topology CI comparison.
  • Method (Welch + exact permutation + BH-FDR): no data to apply it to.

Unblock path (all three required before next dispatch): (a) a stratified-LOS placement mechanism — first-class runner config key or a host-side wall-count scene-staging step; (b) PostGIS restored on the runner; (c) ≥20 ResPlan+ZInD floors staged. This partial seal retires no hypothesis — the ambiguous topology-vs-area state stands until the fair test is runnable.

Attached runs

The attached runs are not in the current atlas snapshot — rebuild via web --build-sim-atlas.